Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

2 Courses

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Week 2 Assignment 2_...
ANS_ Hazards are basically the potential sources from which risks can be generated. In a workplace, there can be several types of hazards that can pose possible risks in the future. • One of such haza...

Week 2 Assignment 2
Week 2 Assignment 2

ANS_ Hazards are basically the potential sources f

Week 1 Discussion_16...
Going through the two forms of the campaign and their cases one thing that came to the surface is that both campaigns had different objectives for their actions. For the Obama Campaign, the main objec...

Week 1 Discussion
Week 1 Discussion

Going through the two forms of the campaign and th

Quiz 2_1680603869.do...
1.Your Answer The processing, interpreting, selecting and organizing of information. 2.Your Answer People who suffer from inadequacy seek to accuse others of having that same issue.

Quiz 2
Quiz 2

1.Your Answer The processing, interpreting, select

Sandel Page 30-37

Sandel Page 30-37

Q 1. Explain the rationale for killing and eating the cabin boy.2. Sandel states that it is possible that the benefits do not outweigh the costs for eating the cabin boy. There will always be unknown factors about the effects of an action. What are some other welfare considerations that Sandel did not mention that may be relevant in this utilitarian examination?3. Explain the major tenets of Bentham's utilitarianism.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
The rational for killing the cabin boy is morally impressible according to me because killing and murdering someone for the basic sustainable reason is not acceptable. The human beings have survived long journey to establish the civilization and now just out of surviving killing someone who is already ill is not justifiable ethically. Stephen and Dudley decided to murder the boy without his consent is offensive and the ultimate violation of the human rights (Sandel, 2009).